Talk:List of Destiny debates: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of List of Destiny debates
More actions
Schwabbbel (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
## Potential solution: Tables are expanded by default. Users can use the table of contents to navigate. (Might require modifying a template) | ## Potential solution: Tables are expanded by default. Users can use the table of contents to navigate. (Might require modifying a template) | ||
## I don't think it is my place to make a decision on this. | ## I don't think it is my place to make a decision on this. | ||
### Spr1ggs: If ctrl+f functionality is completely borked as a result of the collapsed default setting i'll revert it. I believe it was initially done so the page wouldn't be too cumbersome at first glance but if it messes with the utility of the page then it's not worth. | |||
Revision as of 16:43, 21 January 2025
Here are some issues and suggestions for improvements:
- The link columns take up a lot of space. The full-length URL is not useful. Instead, the content of the `Title` column could link to the source video.
- Sometimes there is more information available for a debate, e.g., an on-stream prep, on-stream review of the debate, reactions, Obsidian notes, and wiki page. This information could be linked in an additional 'Comment' column.
- Capitalization of the content in the 'Topic(s)' column is currently inconsistent. Some rules should be laid out.
- I am not sure if the DNC interviews from January 2025 should be listed here.
- Spr1ggs: DNC interviews weren't necessarily debates and probably wouldn't fit here. If nobody else gets to it i'll make a separate fleshed-out article for it once i've completed Pxie's page.
- Schwabbel: I just saw the 'Conversation of the Year' awards. Maybe we should have a new separate "List of Destiny Conversations". There, we could also have a 'Category' column (interviews, Podcasts, on-stream). Some of the items in this debate list would probably fit better there.
- All tables have to be expanded before Ctrl+F-search works.
- Potential solution: 'Expand all' button-thing. (Might require jQuery.)
- Potential solution: Tables are expanded by default. Users can use the table of contents to navigate. (Might require modifying a template)
- I don't think it is my place to make a decision on this.
- Spr1ggs: If ctrl+f functionality is completely borked as a result of the collapsed default setting i'll revert it. I believe it was initially done so the page wouldn't be too cumbersome at first glance but if it messes with the utility of the page then it's not worth.