Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Destiny's Position on the Russian Invasion of Ukraine: Difference between revisions

From Destiny Wiki
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 48: Line 48:


== Timestamps/positions to add ==
== Timestamps/positions to add ==
=== Piers Morgan Guest Seriously IMPRESSES Destiny In Heated Ukraine War Debate ===
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed wikitable"
! colspan="2" | Timestamps
|-
|
* [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=1067 17:47] Destiny takes issue with the argument that Russia's invasion of Ukraine was a result of NATO expansion. He argues that NATO has been expanding for decades, and that the true culprit of the invasion was the removal of pro-Russian leader {{wiki|Viktor Yanukovych|Yanukovych}} after he fled following {{wiki|Euromaidan}}. In response, Russia seized Sevastopol and the rest of Crimea, then went on to fund and fight the war in the Donbas.
* [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=1067 17:47] Destiny takes issue with the argument that Russia's invasion of Ukraine was a result of NATO expansion. He argues that NATO has been expanding for decades, and that the true culprit of the invasion was the removal of pro-Russian leader {{wiki|Viktor Yanukovych|Yanukovych}} after he fled following {{wiki|Euromaidan}}. In response, Russia seized Sevastopol and the rest of Crimea, then went on to fund and fight the war in the Donbas.
* [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=1120 18:40] Destiny addresses the claim that the U.S. promised not to expand NATO eastward. He argues that the "not one inch eastward" remark made by {{wiki|James Baker}} in 1990 concerned the militarization of a reunified Germany, not NATO enlargement into Eastern Europe. He goes on to argue that it was never a written treaty or binding agreement.
* [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=1266 21:06] A chatter asks Destiny why the U.S. didn't support Ukraine in 2014. Destiny responds that the {{wiki|Budapest Memorandum}} is not a binding security guarantee. He elaborates that it was a a "good-faith arrangement" rather than a commitment to come to Ukraine's aid in such cases. Furthermore, Destiny argues that there was a reluctance to act internationally during Obama's tenure do the the fac that the US was still "soyed-out" from prior interventions in {{wiki|Iraq}}.
* [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=1754 29:14] Destiny points out that Russia's actions are routinely excused as realpolitik ("what did you expect them to do?") while Ukraine's and America's actions are consistently held to a very real moral standard. "The different standards are appalling when it comes to treating different countries in conflict."
* [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=1877 31:17] Destiny pushes back on Horton's "it's more complicated" framing about the lack of urgency of the US coming to the aid of Ukraine.  He argues that this war is a rare case where a clear good guy/bad guy stance is warranted.
* [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=3292 54:52] Destiny breaks down the trade dispute that preceded Euromaidan and explains that Ukraine sought a trade deal for access to the European market. He asserts that Ukraine was not seeking a formal EU membership, and that Russia had demanded that Ukraine instead join its more restrictive customs union(where Moscow would set tariff policy).
* [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=3800 1:03:20] Destiny attempts to predict what Cenk's response will be once prompted, predicting he will say Putin is bad, America is bad, and there should be peace. Cenk suggests appeasement and avoidance of nuclear warfare should be avoided at all costs, to which Destiny responds that America should never acquiesce to saber-rattling. He argues that while there might be arguments in  stopping support for Ukraine, none of those should involve wanting to avoid nuclear warfare as the exact same argument could be imposed on any other NATO country. Cenk proceeds to ask how long Ukraine should fight, how much should be spent, and what happens if Ukraine can't win. Destiny argues Cenk would never apply that same "maybe it's time to stop fighting" calculus to Palestine.
* [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=4826 1:20:26] A chatter asks Destiny "what should be done now" with regards to US intervention in the ongoing war. He states that while the situation is now a mess, the US should give Ukraine everything it needs short of nuclear weapons and let it use the support freely (so that any loss isn't for lack of backing). He argues this should have happened two years earlier (if not back in 2014).
|}


== Ukrainian Ana WIP ==
== Ukrainian Ana WIP ==
Line 64: Line 77:
|retrieved-date = 2026, June 03
|retrieved-date = 2026, June 03
|source        = https://x.com/UkrainianAna/status/1830874306886148184
|source        = https://x.com/UkrainianAna/status/1830874306886148184
|archive-url    =  
|archive-url    = https://archive.ph/8kWCG
|archive-date    =  
|archive-date    = 6/18/2026
|url-status      =
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


== Debates ==
== Debates ==

Latest revision as of 23:36, 18 June 2026

From the onset of the conflict, Destiny has held that Russia Wikipedia was the sole aggressor in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine Wikipedia and that Vladimir Putin Wikipedia bore full responsibility for the war.[1] He backed continued United States Wikipedia and NATO Wikipedia aid to Ukraine, and in the years that followed debated both pro-Russia leftists and isolationist conservatives who opposed it.[2] [3][4]

Timestamps/positions to add

Piers Morgan Guest Seriously IMPRESSES Destiny In Heated Ukraine War Debate

Timestamps
  • 17:47 Destiny takes issue with the argument that Russia's invasion of Ukraine was a result of NATO expansion. He argues that NATO has been expanding for decades, and that the true culprit of the invasion was the removal of pro-Russian leader Yanukovych Wikipedia after he fled following Euromaidan Wikipedia. In response, Russia seized Sevastopol and the rest of Crimea, then went on to fund and fight the war in the Donbas.
  • 18:40 Destiny addresses the claim that the U.S. promised not to expand NATO eastward. He argues that the "not one inch eastward" remark made by James Baker Wikipedia in 1990 concerned the militarization of a reunified Germany, not NATO enlargement into Eastern Europe. He goes on to argue that it was never a written treaty or binding agreement.
  • 21:06 A chatter asks Destiny why the U.S. didn't support Ukraine in 2014. Destiny responds that the Budapest Memorandum Wikipedia is not a binding security guarantee. He elaborates that it was a a "good-faith arrangement" rather than a commitment to come to Ukraine's aid in such cases. Furthermore, Destiny argues that there was a reluctance to act internationally during Obama's tenure do the the fac that the US was still "soyed-out" from prior interventions in Iraq Wikipedia.
  • 29:14 Destiny points out that Russia's actions are routinely excused as realpolitik ("what did you expect them to do?") while Ukraine's and America's actions are consistently held to a very real moral standard. "The different standards are appalling when it comes to treating different countries in conflict."
  • 31:17 Destiny pushes back on Horton's "it's more complicated" framing about the lack of urgency of the US coming to the aid of Ukraine. He argues that this war is a rare case where a clear good guy/bad guy stance is warranted.
  • 54:52 Destiny breaks down the trade dispute that preceded Euromaidan and explains that Ukraine sought a trade deal for access to the European market. He asserts that Ukraine was not seeking a formal EU membership, and that Russia had demanded that Ukraine instead join its more restrictive customs union(where Moscow would set tariff policy).
  • 1:03:20 Destiny attempts to predict what Cenk's response will be once prompted, predicting he will say Putin is bad, America is bad, and there should be peace. Cenk suggests appeasement and avoidance of nuclear warfare should be avoided at all costs, to which Destiny responds that America should never acquiesce to saber-rattling. He argues that while there might be arguments in stopping support for Ukraine, none of those should involve wanting to avoid nuclear warfare as the exact same argument could be imposed on any other NATO country. Cenk proceeds to ask how long Ukraine should fight, how much should be spent, and what happens if Ukraine can't win. Destiny argues Cenk would never apply that same "maybe it's time to stop fighting" calculus to Palestine.
  • 1:20:26 A chatter asks Destiny "what should be done now" with regards to US intervention in the ongoing war. He states that while the situation is now a mess, the US should give Ukraine everything it needs short of nuclear weapons and let it use the support freely (so that any loss isn't for lack of backing). He argues this should have happened two years earlier (if not back in 2014).

Ukrainian Ana WIP

Ana started appearing on Destiny's stream in 2022, after recording her experiences living in Ukraine during the Russian invasion. Her introduction to the community came via a Dylan Burns interview, in which she criticized Hasan Piker's coverage of the war and expressed support for Destiny's coverage. She has since become a recurring presence on Destiny's stream and in the subreddit.

Donation drives

Ana has appeared periodically on stream and in /r/destiny with requests for donations to aid Ukraine's defense against the Russian invasion. In recognition of her sustained fundraising efforts, she was awarded a Medal of Merit by the Ukrainian Armed Forces.[5]

Debates

Madeline Pendleton's Insane Ukraine Takes NUKED | Destiny Reacts
Destiny Debates Conservatives on Ukraine (Part 2)
Destiny Debates Conservatives on Ukraine (Part 1)
Destiny Debates on Escalating Russia-Ukraine Endgame
Spectrum Street Epistemology: "The US should support Ukraine for as long as Ukraine wants to fight"
Lex Fridman Podcast #410 ft. Ben Shapiro (Ukraine segment)
Is Russia's War on Ukraine Justified? | Jackson Hinkle & Infrared Vs Dylan Burns & Destiny (Modern-Day Debate)
Debating Pro-Russia Tankies on Ukraine War (Ft. Destiny)
I WAS WRONG ABOUT NATO - Destiny Revises His Ukraine Take


References

  1. YouTube (March 2, 2022). "I WAS WRONG ABOUT NATO - Destiny Revises His Ukraine Take". Archived from the original on 2023, March 03. Retrieved 2026, June 03.
  2. YouTube (March 4, 2022). "Debating Pro-Russia Tankies on Ukraine War (Ft. Destiny)". Archived from the original on 2025, March 05. Retrieved 2026, June 03.
  3. YouTube (March 1, 2025). "Destiny Debates Conservatives on Ukraine (Part 1)". Archived from the original on 2026, March 09. Retrieved 2026, June 03.
  4. YouTube (March 4, 2025). "Destiny Debates Conservatives on Ukraine (Part 2)". Archived from the original on 2025, March 05. Retrieved 2026, June 03.
  5. Twitter (September 2, 2024). "Anastasiya Paraskevova announces Medal of Merit from Ukrainian Armed Forces". Archived from the original on 6/18/2026. Retrieved 2026, June 03.