Destiny's Position on the Russian Invasion of Ukraine: Difference between revisions
From Destiny Wiki
More actions
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
* [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=1266 21:06] A chatter asks Destiny why the U.S. didn't support Ukraine in 2014. Destiny responds that the {{wiki|Budapest Memorandum}} is not a binding security guarantee. He elaborates that it was a a "good-faith arrangement" rather than a commitment to come to Ukraine's aid in such cases. Furthermore, Destiny argues that there was a reluctance to act internationally during Obama's tenure do the the fac that the US was still "soyed-out" from prior interventions in {{wiki|Iraq}}. | * [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=1266 21:06] A chatter asks Destiny why the U.S. didn't support Ukraine in 2014. Destiny responds that the {{wiki|Budapest Memorandum}} is not a binding security guarantee. He elaborates that it was a a "good-faith arrangement" rather than a commitment to come to Ukraine's aid in such cases. Furthermore, Destiny argues that there was a reluctance to act internationally during Obama's tenure do the the fac that the US was still "soyed-out" from prior interventions in {{wiki|Iraq}}. | ||
* [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=1754 29:14] Destiny points out that Russia's actions are routinely excused as realpolitik ("what did you expect them to do?") while Ukraine's and America's actions are consistently held to a very real moral standard. "The different standards are appalling when it comes to treating different countries in conflict." | * [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=1754 29:14] Destiny points out that Russia's actions are routinely excused as realpolitik ("what did you expect them to do?") while Ukraine's and America's actions are consistently held to a very real moral standard. "The different standards are appalling when it comes to treating different countries in conflict." | ||
* [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=1877 31:17] Destiny pushes back on Horton's "it's more complicated" framing about the lack of urgency of the US coming to the aid of Ukraine. He argues that this war is a rare case where a clear good guy/bad guy stance is warranted | * [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=1877 31:17] Destiny pushes back on Horton's "it's more complicated" framing about the lack of urgency of the US coming to the aid of Ukraine. He argues that this war is a rare case where a clear good guy/bad guy stance is warranted. | ||
* [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=3292 54:52] Destiny breaks down the trade dispute that preceded Euromaidan and explains that Ukraine sought a trade deal for access to the European market. He asserts that Ukraine was not seeking a formal EU membership, and that Russia had demanded that Ukraine instead join its more restrictive customs union(where Moscow would set tariff policy). | * [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=3292 54:52] Destiny breaks down the trade dispute that preceded Euromaidan and explains that Ukraine sought a trade deal for access to the European market. He asserts that Ukraine was not seeking a formal EU membership, and that Russia had demanded that Ukraine instead join its more restrictive customs union(where Moscow would set tariff policy). | ||
* [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=3800 1:03:20] Destiny attempts to predict what Cenk's response will be once prompted, predicting he will say Putin is bad, America is bad, and there should be peace. Cenk suggests appeasement and avoidance of nuclear warfare should be avoided at all costs, to which Destiny responds that America should never acquiesce to saber-rattling. He argues that while there might be arguments in stopping support for Ukraine, none of those should involve wanting to avoid nuclear warfare as the exact same argument could be imposed on any other NATO country. Cenk proceeds to ask how long Ukraine should fight, how much should be spent, and what happens if Ukraine can't win. Destiny argues Cenk would never apply that same "maybe it's time to stop fighting" calculus to Palestine. | * [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=3800 1:03:20] Destiny attempts to predict what Cenk's response will be once prompted, predicting he will say Putin is bad, America is bad, and there should be peace. Cenk suggests appeasement and avoidance of nuclear warfare should be avoided at all costs, to which Destiny responds that America should never acquiesce to saber-rattling. He argues that while there might be arguments in stopping support for Ukraine, none of those should involve wanting to avoid nuclear warfare as the exact same argument could be imposed on any other NATO country. Cenk proceeds to ask how long Ukraine should fight, how much should be spent, and what happens if Ukraine can't win. Destiny argues Cenk would never apply that same "maybe it's time to stop fighting" calculus to Palestine. | ||
| Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
|retrieved-date = 2026, June 03 | |retrieved-date = 2026, June 03 | ||
|source = https://x.com/UkrainianAna/status/1830874306886148184 | |source = https://x.com/UkrainianAna/status/1830874306886148184 | ||
|archive-url = | |archive-url = https://archive.ph/8kWCG | ||
|archive-date = | |archive-date = 6/18/2026 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
== Debates == | == Debates == | ||
Latest revision as of 23:36, 18 June 2026
|
From the onset of the conflict, Destiny has held that Russia 
was the sole aggressor in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine and that Vladimir Putin bore full responsibility for the war.[1] He backed continued United States and NATO aid to Ukraine, and in the years that followed debated both pro-Russia leftists and isolationist conservatives who opposed it.[2]
[3][4]
Timestamps/positions to add
Piers Morgan Guest Seriously IMPRESSES Destiny In Heated Ukraine War Debate
| Timestamps | |
|---|---|
| |
Ukrainian Ana WIP
| Main Article: Ukrainian Ana |
Ana started appearing on Destiny's stream in 2022, after recording her experiences living in Ukraine during the Russian invasion. Her introduction to the community came via a Dylan Burns interview, in which she criticized Hasan Piker's coverage of the war and expressed support for Destiny's coverage. She has since become a recurring presence on Destiny's stream and in the subreddit.
Donation drives
| Main Article: Ukrainian Ana Fundraisers |
Ana has appeared periodically on stream and in /r/destiny with requests for donations to aid Ukraine's defense against the Russian invasion. In recognition of her sustained fundraising efforts, she was awarded a Medal of Merit by the Ukrainian Armed Forces.[5]
Debates
References
- ↑ YouTube (March 2, 2022). "I WAS WRONG ABOUT NATO - Destiny Revises His Ukraine Take". Archived from the original on 2023, March 03. Retrieved 2026, June 03.
- ↑ YouTube (March 4, 2022). "Debating Pro-Russia Tankies on Ukraine War (Ft. Destiny)". Archived from the original on 2025, March 05. Retrieved 2026, June 03.
- ↑ YouTube (March 1, 2025). "Destiny Debates Conservatives on Ukraine (Part 1)". Archived from the original on 2026, March 09. Retrieved 2026, June 03.
- ↑ YouTube (March 4, 2025). "Destiny Debates Conservatives on Ukraine (Part 2)". Archived from the original on 2025, March 05. Retrieved 2026, June 03.
- ↑ Twitter (September 2, 2024). "Anastasiya Paraskevova announces Medal of Merit from Ukrainian Armed Forces". Archived from the original on 6/18/2026. Retrieved 2026, June 03.