Destiny's Position on the Russian Invasion of Ukraine: Difference between revisions
From Destiny Wiki
More actions
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
== Timestamps/positions to add == | == Timestamps/positions to add == | ||
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed wikitable" | |||
! colspan="2" | Timestamps | |||
Piers Morgan Guest Seriously IMPRESSES Destiny In Heated Ukraine War Debate | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
* [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=1067 17:47] Destiny takes issue with the argument that Russia's invasion of Ukraine was a result of NATO expansion. He argues that NATO has been expanding for decades, and that the true culprit of the invasion was the removal of pro-Russian leader {{wiki|Viktor Yanukovych|Yanukovych}} after he fled following {{wiki|Euromaidan}}. In response, Russia seized Sevastopol and the rest of Crimea, then went on to fund and fight the war in the Donbas. | * [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=1067 17:47] Destiny takes issue with the argument that Russia's invasion of Ukraine was a result of NATO expansion. He argues that NATO has been expanding for decades, and that the true culprit of the invasion was the removal of pro-Russian leader {{wiki|Viktor Yanukovych|Yanukovych}} after he fled following {{wiki|Euromaidan}}. In response, Russia seized Sevastopol and the rest of Crimea, then went on to fund and fight the war in the Donbas. | ||
* [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=1120 18:40] Destiny addresses the claim that the U.S. promised not to expand NATO eastward. He argues that the "not one inch eastward" remark made by {{wiki|James Baker}} in 1990 concerned the militarization of a reunified Germany, not NATO enlargement into Eastern Europe. He goes on to argue that it was never a written treaty or binding agreement. | * [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=1120 18:40] Destiny addresses the claim that the U.S. promised not to expand NATO eastward. He argues that the "not one inch eastward" remark made by {{wiki|James Baker}} in 1990 concerned the militarization of a reunified Germany, not NATO enlargement into Eastern Europe. He goes on to argue that it was never a written treaty or binding agreement. | ||
| Line 53: | Line 58: | ||
* [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=1754 29:14] Destiny points out that Russia's actions are routinely excused as realpolitik ("what did you expect them to do?") while Ukraine's and America's actions are consistently held to a very real moral standard. "The different standards are appalling when it comes to treating different countries in conflict." | * [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=1754 29:14] Destiny points out that Russia's actions are routinely excused as realpolitik ("what did you expect them to do?") while Ukraine's and America's actions are consistently held to a very real moral standard. "The different standards are appalling when it comes to treating different countries in conflict." | ||
* [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=1877 31:17] Destiny pushes back on Horton's "it's more complicated" framing about the lack of urgency of the US coming to the aid of Ukraine. He argues that this war is a rare case where a clear good guy/bad guy stance is warranted. He goes on to sta* * [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=3292 54:52] Destiny breaks down the trade dispute that preceded Euromaidan and explains that Ukraine sought a trade deal for access to the European market. He asserts that Ukraine was not seeking a formal EU membership, and that Russia had demanded that Ukraine instead join its more restrictive customs union(where Moscow would set tariff policy). te that Putin is widely disliked by neighboring countries and likely even much of his own population. | * [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=1877 31:17] Destiny pushes back on Horton's "it's more complicated" framing about the lack of urgency of the US coming to the aid of Ukraine. He argues that this war is a rare case where a clear good guy/bad guy stance is warranted. He goes on to sta* * [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=3292 54:52] Destiny breaks down the trade dispute that preceded Euromaidan and explains that Ukraine sought a trade deal for access to the European market. He asserts that Ukraine was not seeking a formal EU membership, and that Russia had demanded that Ukraine instead join its more restrictive customs union(where Moscow would set tariff policy). te that Putin is widely disliked by neighboring countries and likely even much of his own population. | ||
* [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=3292 54:52] Destiny breaks down the trade dispute that preceded Euromaidan and explains that Ukraine sought a trade deal for access to the European market. He asserts that Ukraine was not seeking a formal EU membership, and that Russia had demanded that Ukraine instead join its more restrictive customs union(where Moscow would set tariff policy). | |||
* [https://youtu.be/2EyAMvgcsY4?t=3800 1:03:20] Destiny attempts to predict what Cenk's response will be once prompted, predicting he will say Putin is bad, America is bad, and there should be peace. Cenk suggests appeasement and avoidance of nuclear warfare should be avoided at all costs, to which Destiny responds that America should never acquiesce to saber-rattling. He argues that while there might be arguments in stopping support for Ukraine, none of those should involve wanting to avoid nuclear warfare as the exact same argument could be imposed on any other NATO country. Cenk proceeds to ask how long Ukraine should fight, how much should be spent, and what happens if Ukraine can't win. Destiny argues Cenk would never apply that same "maybe it's time to stop fighting" calculus to Palestine | |||
|} | |||
== Ukrainian Ana WIP == | == Ukrainian Ana WIP == | ||
Revision as of 16:26, 17 June 2026
|
From the onset of the conflict, Destiny has held that Russia 
was the sole aggressor in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine and that Vladimir Putin bore full responsibility for the war.[1] He backed continued United States and NATO aid to Ukraine, and in the years that followed debated both pro-Russia leftists and isolationist conservatives who opposed it.[2]
[3][4]
Timestamps/positions to add
| Timestamps
Piers Morgan Guest Seriously IMPRESSES Destiny In Heated Ukraine War Debate | |
|---|---|
| |
Ukrainian Ana WIP
| Main Article: Ukrainian Ana |
Ana started appearing on Destiny's stream in 2022, after recording her experiences living in Ukraine during the Russian invasion. Her introduction to the community came via a Dylan Burns interview, in which she criticized Hasan Piker's coverage of the war and expressed support for Destiny's coverage. She has since become a recurring presence on Destiny's stream and in the subreddit.
Donation drives
| Main Article: Ukrainian Ana Fundraisers |
Ana has appeared periodically on stream and in /r/destiny with requests for donations to aid Ukraine's defense against the Russian invasion. In recognition of her sustained fundraising efforts, she was awarded a Medal of Merit by the Ukrainian Armed Forces.[5]
Debates
References
- ↑ YouTube (March 2, 2022). "I WAS WRONG ABOUT NATO - Destiny Revises His Ukraine Take". Archived from the original on 2023, March 03. Retrieved 2026, June 03.
- ↑ YouTube (March 4, 2022). "Debating Pro-Russia Tankies on Ukraine War (Ft. Destiny)". Archived from the original on 2025, March 05. Retrieved 2026, June 03.
- ↑ YouTube (March 1, 2025). "Destiny Debates Conservatives on Ukraine (Part 1)". Archived from the original on 2026, March 09. Retrieved 2026, June 03.
- ↑ YouTube (March 4, 2025). "Destiny Debates Conservatives on Ukraine (Part 2)". Archived from the original on 2025, March 05. Retrieved 2026, June 03.
- ↑ Twitter (September 2, 2024). "Anastasiya Paraskevova announces Medal of Merit from Ukrainian Armed Forces". Retrieved 2026, June 03.