Talk:Hasan Piker: Difference between revisions
(created talk topic about non neutral language on hasan page) |
m (neutral language) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== Non-Neutral Language On Page === | === Non-Neutral Language On Page === | ||
As much as we may dislike Hasan his page has a lot of what I would consider non-neutral language. His biography page includes language talking about his "lavish lifestyle" which may be true, but comes off as a hit piece rather than a factual biography. The Young Turks section also has controversial quotes which while it may be true, is probably better suited to be places in the "Controversies" section along with the claims of his lavish lifestyle and any mansion references. For now I'll flag anything controversial that doesn't have a citation. Any thoughts or opposition to the above? [[User:Noonyaaz|Noonyaaz]] ([[User talk:Noonyaaz|talk]]) 04:16, 20 September 2023 (UTC) | As much as we may dislike Hasan his page has a lot of what I would consider non-neutral language. His biography page includes language talking about his "lavish lifestyle" which may be true, but comes off as a hit piece rather than a factual biography. The Young Turks section also has controversial quotes which while it may be true, is probably better suited to be places in the "Controversies" section along with the claims of his lavish lifestyle and any mansion references. For now I'll flag anything controversial that doesn't have a citation. Any thoughts or opposition to the above? [[User:Noonyaaz|Noonyaaz]] ([[User talk:Noonyaaz|talk]]) 04:16, 20 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
[[File:NODDERS.gif]] | |||
We should absolutely be going for as objective/neutral as possible. Things might slip through and humor is allowed in reason. Insulting by omitting context doesn't help anyone and sets a bad precedent. If need be a middle ground would be "Controversial Opinions", especially if ongoing feuding is happening. | |||
—[[user:tape|Tape]] 12:50, 20 September 2023 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 04:50, 20 September 2023
Non-Neutral Language On Page
As much as we may dislike Hasan his page has a lot of what I would consider non-neutral language. His biography page includes language talking about his "lavish lifestyle" which may be true, but comes off as a hit piece rather than a factual biography. The Young Turks section also has controversial quotes which while it may be true, is probably better suited to be places in the "Controversies" section along with the claims of his lavish lifestyle and any mansion references. For now I'll flag anything controversial that doesn't have a citation. Any thoughts or opposition to the above? Noonyaaz (talk) 04:16, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
We should absolutely be going for as objective/neutral as possible. Things might slip through and humor is allowed in reason. Insulting by omitting context doesn't help anyone and sets a bad precedent. If need be a middle ground would be "Controversial Opinions", especially if ongoing feuding is happening. —Tape 12:50, 20 September 2023 (EST)