Talk:Chatters: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Change Controversial/Banned Chatters section == | == Change Controversial/Banned Chatters section == | ||
So do yall think we should change the "Controversial/Banned Chatters" section? A decent chunk of notable chatters are controversial, should it instead be made into a section of chatters that are just no longer in chat ? Permanently or long term banned chatters & chatters who just dont chat anymore would make sense. Or we could just move all chatters that have a controversy surrounding them into that category and the notable chatters can just be like a positive category --[[User:RiN_LuX|Rin]] 1:02, 29 August | So do yall think we should change the "Controversial/Banned Chatters" section? A decent chunk of notable chatters are controversial, should it instead be made into a section of chatters that are just no longer in chat ? Permanently or long term banned chatters & chatters who just dont chat anymore would make sense. Or we could just move all chatters that have a controversy surrounding them into that category and the notable chatters can just be like a positive category --[[User:RiN_LuX|Rin]] 1:02, 29 August 2023 (EST) | ||
== Remove Normal Chatters == | == Remove Normal Chatters == | ||
This seems like something that is a cute meme, but ultimately doesn't belong, probably should prevent people from remaking this section. Adding yourself to the chatters list is also probably not a great thing, unless the chatter themself is reasonably known.--[[User:RiN_LuX|Rin]] 10:17, 29 August | This seems like something that is a cute meme, but ultimately doesn't belong, probably should prevent people from remaking this section. Adding yourself to the chatters list is also probably not a great thing, unless the chatter themself is reasonably known.--[[User:RiN_LuX|Rin]] 10:17, 29 August 2023 (EST) | ||
== Change CCC Group == | == Change CCC Group == | ||
I would like it if the CCC was just a subsection of notable chatters (since the CCC is literally just a subsection of notable chatters), but that would mess up the pretty formatting to add the "===" header, making it so you cant collapse sections for some reason (im stupid let me know if this can be avoided). Maybe making a tag system for types of chatters would make sense? It could be real flairs, as well as YEE vs P*PE, CCC status, Conductor status, Puzzler, nsfw poster/spammer etc. --[[User:RiN_LuX|Rin]] 10:26, 29 August | I would like it if the CCC was just a subsection of notable chatters (since the CCC is literally just a subsection of notable chatters), but that would mess up the pretty formatting to add the "===" header, making it so you cant collapse sections for some reason (im stupid let me know if this can be avoided). Maybe making a tag system for types of chatters would make sense? It could be real flairs, as well as YEE vs P*PE, CCC status, Conductor status, Puzzler, nsfw poster/spammer etc. --[[User:RiN_LuX|Rin]] 10:26, 29 August 2023 (EST) | ||
== Chatters and Infamy == | == Chatters and Infamy == | ||
Something else that should be looked out for is chatters possibly schizo posting ironically or something just to get on the wiki page, I doubt this will become an issue but something to keep an eye out for in case chat becomes too focused on this page. It might lead to this just being a page needing to be heavily protected/monitored --[[User:RiN_LuX|Rin]] 10:29, 29 August | Something else that should be looked out for is chatters possibly schizo posting ironically or something just to get on the wiki page, I doubt this will become an issue but something to keep an eye out for in case chat becomes too focused on this page. It might lead to this just being a page needing to be heavily protected/monitored --[[User:RiN_LuX|Rin]] 10:29, 29 August 2023 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 19:14, 29 August 2023
Change Controversial/Banned Chatters section
So do yall think we should change the "Controversial/Banned Chatters" section? A decent chunk of notable chatters are controversial, should it instead be made into a section of chatters that are just no longer in chat ? Permanently or long term banned chatters & chatters who just dont chat anymore would make sense. Or we could just move all chatters that have a controversy surrounding them into that category and the notable chatters can just be like a positive category --Rin 1:02, 29 August 2023 (EST)
Remove Normal Chatters
This seems like something that is a cute meme, but ultimately doesn't belong, probably should prevent people from remaking this section. Adding yourself to the chatters list is also probably not a great thing, unless the chatter themself is reasonably known.--Rin 10:17, 29 August 2023 (EST)
Change CCC Group
I would like it if the CCC was just a subsection of notable chatters (since the CCC is literally just a subsection of notable chatters), but that would mess up the pretty formatting to add the "===" header, making it so you cant collapse sections for some reason (im stupid let me know if this can be avoided). Maybe making a tag system for types of chatters would make sense? It could be real flairs, as well as YEE vs P*PE, CCC status, Conductor status, Puzzler, nsfw poster/spammer etc. --Rin 10:26, 29 August 2023 (EST)
Chatters and Infamy
Something else that should be looked out for is chatters possibly schizo posting ironically or something just to get on the wiki page, I doubt this will become an issue but something to keep an eye out for in case chat becomes too focused on this page. It might lead to this just being a page needing to be heavily protected/monitored --Rin 10:29, 29 August 2023 (EST)